The often-cited phrase “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket” is commonly attributed to Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, the Spanish novelist, who included it in Don Quixote in 1605.
The concept is utilized in portfolio allocation highlighting the value of diversification and risk management, suggesting that spreading resources across multiple avenues is a wiser approach than relying solely on one.
Portfolio diversification remains one of the most effective ways to protect capital and enhance long term, risk-adjusted returns. Yet in practice, diversification is often misapplied or oversimplified.
For decades, the 60/40 portfolio was the go-to strategy for balanced investing. The idea was straightforward: stocks provide growth, while bonds offer stability. But in today’s fast-evolving environment, this traditional approach is no longer enough. Several structural challenges now limit the effectiveness of traditional diversification approaches:
True diversification requires a more deliberate approach – one that clearly distinguishes what portions of a portfolio are generating beta (broad market exposure) versus alpha (idiosyncratic return). It should also reflect the investor’s current risk appetite, incorporate views on current market and geopolitical dynamics, and adapt as those views evolve.
The following three strategies can help build a more resilient and well-balanced portfolio.
While an allocation to equity ETFs and low-cost fixed income mutual funds are very effective for managing portfolio costs, a more robust approach involves generating beta (systematic market exposure), while reserving alpha generation for consciously selected, higher conviction strategies or assets.
Beta exposure is typically agnostic to macroeconomic and geopolitical expectations; its role is to provide broad market participation. In contrast, alpha exposure should reflect investor views and incorporate thoughtful analysis of each asset’s contribution to potential returns, portfolio-wide diversification and overall volatility.
Considering the following strategies:
Unlike stocks and bonds, the universe of alternatives is incredibly heterogeneous, spanning an array of asset classes, investment styles and vehicle structures. Alternative investments are meant to complement, not replace, traditional assets, offering differentiated sources of return and diversification.
Allocating to alternatives as a strategic, long-term investment within a diversified portfolio can enhance risk-adjusted returns and help reduce overall volatility.
Diversification benefits vary significantly across alternatives strategies. Many alternative investments are still correlated with the equity markets, and sometimes with a balanced portfolio, especially during broad market downturns. So, it is critical to assess correlation in stress periods.
That said, investors can find alternatives that have historically generated alpha and shown low correlation to both stocks and bonds. Some offer inflation protection: real assets like real estate, infrastructure and commodities tend to perform well when inflation is rising. In addition, many alternatives, such as private equity, REITs, and private credit, generate diversified income streams while also offering long-term growth potential.
Alternative investments often involve higher fees, less liquidity, commitments to capital calls over time, and more intensive due diligence. For those less familiar, it may make sense to start with more accessible vehicles or those with transparent structures. Consider the following entry points:
Many investors think diversification ends with a balanced mix of stocks and bonds, or perhaps the addition of traditional alternative assets. But in periods of systemic stress, correlation often spikes toward one, leaving portfolios vulnerable to significant drawdowns. To build a truly resilient portfolio, investors must go beyond conventional diversification and pursue uncorrelated alpha: return sources that behave independently of broad market movements.
Uncorrelated alpha refers to investment strategies that aim to deliver returns irrespective of market direction. While traditional investments, including many alternatives, tend to move in tandem with the market, uncorrelated alpha strategies, such as market-neutral hedge funds, are designed to generate returns with minimal correlation to equities, bonds, or macroeconomic cycles.
The idea is not to replace existing exposures, but to refine them. As mentioned earlier, a forward-looking portfolio construction approach separates beta (systematic market exposure) from alpha (idiosyncratic, manager-driven returns). This approach allows the investor to more precisely manage the portfolio overall risk profile.
By selecting exposure to alpha and beta independently, investors can more effectively pursue their return targets while managing their aggregate risk levels.
We recommend a practical approach: create two conceptual sleeves. A beta sleeve, providing broad, systematic exposure; and an alpha sleeve, focused on strategies with proven track records of generating excess returns that are uncorrelated not only with traditional markets, but with each other.
This nuanced view of alpha is critical. Two strategies with similar return profiles may still have highly correlated alphas, reducing the benefits of diversification. The objective is to identify managers with differentiated sources of returns, whether through niche arbitrage opportunities, disciplined long/short equity selection, or event-driven positioning.
Generating uncorrelated alpha is not about finding “better” bets. It’s about constructing a system of non-overlapping risks. For example, one approach involves allocating to smaller, lesser-known hedge funds that operate in specific market niches, where managers bring specialized expertise and demonstrate agility in volatile environments.
We also emphasize a proactive, scenario-based investment process, continuously reassessing exposures and refining portfolio construction. Rather than relying on historical optimization alone, this approach, being forward-looking and risk-aware, enables greater agility to navigate changing conditions.
Incorporating uncorrelated alpha strategies into a diversified portfolio offers multiple benefits:
In an environment where the next shock may not look like the last one, diversifying by asset class is no longer sufficient. Diversification by correlation is the next frontier – and uncorrelated alpha is a critical building block in achieving it.
Diversification is more than simply holding a mix of assets. It’s about constructing a portfolio that is strategically aligned, risk-aware, and adaptable to different market conditions. Moving beyond the traditional 60/40 model and incorporating differentiated sources of returns, such as alternative investments and uncorrelated alpha strategies, can help build a more stable and resilient portfolio.
**********
David Martin is the CEO and CIO of Arctium Capital Management. Connect with him on LinkedIn here.
Enrico Dallavecchia is the President and COO of Arctium Capital Management. Connect with him on LinkedIn here.